Features

EYFS Best Practice: All about ... Teaching in the EYFS

Bureaucracy and misconceptions led to the decline of 'teaching' in the original EYFS. Early years expert Lena Engel explains why it must be restored to its rightful place under the revised framework.

The past year has been a period of rapid change for the early years sector, especially in view of the revised Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) and its impact on the assessment system for monitoring children's progress through the EYFS Profile at the end of the reception year.

Practitioners and teachers have responded as best they can to changes and to the new framework for inspection that has been implemented. The revision of the curriculum focused on reducing bureaucracy and on ensuring that practitioners used more of their time interacting and communicating with children rather than observing them.

The review also questioned teaching and learning in principle and, in particular, examined the dichotomy between adult-led and child-initiated activities. This article is about trying to understand what is meant by teaching in the EYFS, and to investigate what the difference is between adult-led and child-initiated learning. The aim is to help practitioners feel more confident about how they want to deliver a high-quality service to children and parents, and thereby ensure the best outcomes for children's learning.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here