News

International Early Learning and Child Well-being Study: Why some children are running to catch up

What can we learn from the OECD’s International Early Learning and Child Well-being Study? Dr Martina Street explains criticisms of the research, findings, and what future studies should focus on
Low-income families often can’t afford ‘middle-class’ activities, so their children are at a disadvantage from the start
Low-income families often can’t afford ‘middle-class’ activities, so their children are at a disadvantage from the start

Those of us who work in the early childhood sector know the benefits of good-quality early education. It may have taken time for governments across the world to recognise these benefits, but once they did, their interest and investment have been considerable.

Indeed, the early childhood education sector’s rapid and continued growth in England has been in contrast to cuts in other services, and incomes, that have disproportionately affected economically disadvantaged families with young children.

In this evolving early years policy context, there is also a sense in which children’s educational outcomes at the age of five years are now becoming conflated with notions of well-being, and may appear to be predicated on their achieving stage-specific educational outcomes. It is within this context that the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) conducted its International Early Learning and Well-Being Study (IELS).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here