News

To the point...

Our weekly columnist Beatrix Campbell sees little progress being made in chld protection despite a review of cases It was easy to miss: minister for children Margaret Hodge this month delivered the results of the mighty national search of files of children made the subject of a care order that she commissioned in the summer. This was in the wake of the Angela Cannings appeal, in which the judges proposed that there should be no prosecution in infant death cases that depended on disputed medical evidence.

It was easy to miss: minister for children Margaret Hodge this month delivered the results of the mighty national search of files of children made the subject of a care order that she commissioned in the summer. This was in the wake of the Angela Cannings appeal, in which the judges proposed that there should be no prosecution in infant death cases that depended on disputed medical evidence.

We were warned of a national scandal: hundreds of miscarriages of justice.

The triumphalism was palpable. Campaigners for accused adults had panicked the minister - who was always flaky on child protection - into ordering a trawl of records. So, 28,867 children's files were surveyed. The result? Five raised doubts as a result of disputed medical evidence. Only one is now being reconsidered by the court.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here