Opinion

Opinion: To the point - The future of learning

Children's centres may not be best for early learning, says Pat Broadhead.

I want to continue my focus on the Rose Review of the Primary Curriculum which I wrote about for this column last month (22 January). I talked then about my concerns relating to early entry to the reception class currently being advocated in the Review. Under the lead of our president, Wendy Scott, TACTYC has just prepared a response to this which you can see on our website and which may assist you in making your own responses - there's still time.

I wrote about the need to protect children's rights in relation to them being in a high-quality and age-appropriate learning environment. For children of five years and under, this is a nursery environment, a pre-school, a kindergarten - whatever you call it. Each of these, in whichever country you find it, has two underpinning features in common. First, they place playful, experiential and active learning at the heart of the child's curricular experiences both indoors and outdoors. Second, and integral to the first point, they support the child's right to select and develop their playful learning experiences from the basis of their own interests and preoccupations, some of which come from their home life and some from their 'school' life. The adult's role is to nurture and support this process with appropriate pedagogy and provision. Knowing how to do that is a very complex business.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here