Opinion

The revised EYFS: Too little, too late

It's time for a completely new approach, argue Margaret Edgington, Grethe Hooper Hansen, Richard House and Kim Simpson, for the the Open EYE Steering Group

 

Since late 2007, the Open EYE campaign has challenged key aspects of the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS), most particularly its controversially statutory  learning and development requirements, its developmentally inappropriate ‘Early Learning Goals’, and the impact on practitioners’ thinking  of a relentless, ‘assessment-mindedness’, determined far more by England’s uniquely early school starting age than by any serious concern for young children’s general well-being.

While small children in the rest of Europe are free to play, England imposes a school mentality from earliest infancy. With a new coalition government less ideologically and personally identified with the EYFS, hope was initially raised that the worst mistakes of the original framework would be rectified, or, at the very least, substantially ameliorated. However, the Revised EYFS falls tragically short of addressing its well documented shortcomings, and as such it is hugely disappointing, and a missed opportunity whose scale is difficult to overestimate.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here