Features

Editor's view - So much is at stake in the children's centre cutbacks

Every day brings a new report of another local authority considering cuts to its children's centres. Sheffield, Westminster, Derby, Barnet, Hammersmith and Fulham - the list is growing as councils attempt to deal with the effects of drastically reduced budgets.

The outcomes may be varied, with some centres closing altogether, others being handed to voluntary providers, some dispensing with those 'non-essential' services, and others, such as in Bury, looking at charging for large parts of their programmes.

The Government maintains that there is sufficient money for Sure Start. In a parliamentary answer last week, Children and Families Minister Sarah Teather said that 'the recent spending review announced that there is funding available to maintain the current network of children's centres'.

This does not seem to be what is happening on the ground, however, even though local authorities are holding consultations on changes. And what a shame it will be if Sure Start loses its function as a universal service. There is no stigma attached to using a children's centre. You don't have to be 'deprived' or 'disadvantaged', and it is this mixing of families from many walks of life that can be such a force for increasing social cohesion and preventing isolation.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here



Related