News

Amendment 'will confuse parents'

Campaigners for a complete ban on smacking have warned that last week's Commons vote to allow parents to physically chastise children as long as they do not leave a mark is unworkable, confusing and likely to lead to more parents being prosecuted. The Commons rejected the call from children's charities and a range of professional organisations to abolish the 'reasonable chastisement'

The Commons rejected the call from children's charities and a range of professional organisations to abolish the 'reasonable chastisement'

provision which denies children the same legal protection afforded to adults. MPs voted instead for an amendment to the Children Bill defining an acceptable level of physical punishment of children.

NSPCC director Mary Marsh said, 'Bad legal reform is worse than no legal reform, and that is what these proposals amount to. Violence towards children is still legally acceptable as long as you are careful not to leave a mark. The law needs to send out a clear message that it is just as wrong to hit a child as it is to hit an adult.'

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here