News

Local programmes found ineffectual

The Government's flagship 3bn Sure Start programme has had 'little impact' on children and families in Britain's most deprived areas, according to early findings from an independent study.

The study found that children from severely disadvantaged families - teenage mothers, lone parents, workless households - appear to be 'adversely affected by living in a SSLP community', whereas those from relatively less disadvantaged households benefit 'somewhat' from living in SSLP areas.

Children of teenage mothers, lone parents and workless households growing up in SSLP areas scored lower on verbal ability and social development than their counterparts in non-Sure Start areas, and the children of teenage mothers exhibited more behaviour problems.

Professor Edward Melhuish, head of the study, said, 'The adverse effects cannot be reported without mentioning the benefits. The beneficial effects of SSLPs - better social development and less negative parenting - applied to the majority of children and families living in Sure Start areas. No adverse effects occurred in children with non-teenage mothers.'

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here