News

The lessons we really need

By Professor Colin Blakemore, director of the Oxford Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, from a lecture given last month at the RSA in London All the evidence that's been published shows that formal instruction in language and in mathematics before the age of seven or even eight does not pay off in terms of lasting benefits. I know there are differences because there are other factors in school systems that are different, but a comparison of schoolchildren who start formal teaching at the age of five with those who start at seven shows the latter have caught up by the age of nine and, what's more, are doing much better by the age of 16.

I know there are differences because there are other factors in school systems that are different, but a comparison of schoolchildren who start formal teaching at the age of five with those who start at seven shows the latter have caught up by the age of nine and, what's more, are doing much better by the age of 16.

So I would posit that too formal an approach to teaching before the age of six does not produce benefits, and what's more, of course, it loses the opportunity for other things. What is the brain naturally doing during that period? It's learning about self, about others, about altruistic collaboration. In fact, I would say it's learning about the kinds of things our society in the last 30 years has become most deficient in.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here



Related