Opinion

Opinion: Editor's view

A scheme for universal funding for childcare would come at too dear a price.

The report Little Britons: Financing childcare choice, by think-tank Policy Exchange, calls for a Parental Care Allowance to be the principal means of funding for families with children from birth to three (see News, page 4). This recommendation of a universal payment to follow the child, whether the parents are using formal or informal childcare, working or at home, is certainly radical.

The proposal has some attractions in terms of making it easier for parental leave to be extended, freeing funding from the requirement to be in work.

However, there are also drawbacks. The PCA scheme would be very expensive, and Policy Exchange advocates paying for it by scrapping childcare tax credits, vouchers, Sure Start maternity grants and eventually the free early years entitlement for three- and four-year-olds. Thus, the policies aimed at helping children out of poverty and providing quality nursery education would be scrapped in favour of a non-means-tested payment.

There would be an impetus, too, towards informal, unregistered care, which would surely not be in the interests of young children.

Beyond our Ken

Nursery World had hoped this week to publish an 'In My View' column from the Labour candidate for London Mayor, Ken Livngstone, to follow the past two weeks' contributions from rivals Boris Johnson and Brian Paddick which outlined their plans for childcare. However, despite repeated calls and e-mails to Mr Livingstone's campaign office, we have had no response, not even a refusal! We hope that this is not a reflection of Ken's interest in such a vital area.