Opinion

Splitting headache!

One MP's recent comments recall the age-old debate about the 'care' and 'education' of young children, says Michael Pettavel

The recent foot-in-the-mouth comments by Suffolk MP Dr Thérèse Coffey, saying that the Government’s flagship 30-hours policy ‘is largely based on the premise that the 30 hours equivalent … is split into 15 hours of education provision and 15 hours of general childcare without a specific educational focus’, made me chuckle.

I am sure the sector’s reaction to her comments have brought into sharp focus just how many dissatisfied groups there are. It seems a bit misguided to relentlessly annoy the very people you rely on to make your policy work.

I know we are all feeling a bit peeved at having to deliver everything for nothing and do it without negatively impacting the children who should be a the heart of the debate. Apart from underlining how little is understood about the importance of the early years, it shows so clearly that we are often seen as a baby-sitting service.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here