As campaigning groups are pointing out, the favoured amendment would only serve to confuse people and perpetuate the idea that hitting children is acceptable. Smacking is apparently okay unless it causes bruising, scratching or reddening of the skin! The LibDem peer championing the amendment says, 'Parents will still be able to smack their children if they do not harm them physically or mentally.' So who would be the judge of that?
We have to get rid of the notion that some kinds of smacking are acceptable. This gives the message that children do not have the same rights as adults not to be hit, and that they are somehow their parents'
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Unlimited access to news and opinion
-
Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news
Already have an account? Sign in here