News

Lend a hand

Children have a natural love of art making, but should practitioners intervene to introduce new skills? Kristen Ali Eglinton offers ways to support a child's creativity As early years practitioners, we have a vital role to play in developing children's creativity. But how best to support their artistic endeavours raises important questions, among them the question of intervention. If we want children to operate at the height of their creativity and, at the same time, reap all the educational benefits that sound art experiences can potentially offer, should we intervene or not?

As early years practitioners, we have a vital role to play in developing children's creativity. But how best to support their artistic endeavours raises important questions, among them the question of intervention. If we want children to operate at the height of their creativity and, at the same time, reap all the educational benefits that sound art experiences can potentially offer, should we intervene or not?

The debate for and against intervention has been going on for decades and continues today. The non-interventionist approach, often termed the 'laissez-faire' approach, has its roots in early 20th century art education practice, when the writings and practice of various celebrated art educators and philosophers gave rise to the widespread, and still sound, belief that the child should have freedom to create, investigate and explore (Leeds, 1989).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here