Whitebread and Lysandra Sinclaire-Harding debunk some of the
'neuromyths' and misdiagnoses doing the rounds and look at how
neuroscience findings might inform practice in early childhood
education.
![](/media/uyqolvsi/ldbrain.jpg?width=1002&height=668&bgcolor=White&v=1da4d7b1b88fe90)
There is currently a great deal of interest in neuroscience and what it might tell us about education, particularly in relation to the early years. Governments around the world are investing huge sums of money in understanding differences, disorders and diseases of the brain, and it is clear that there is huge potential for this new science to inform us about early brain development.
At the same time, however, the appetite for 'brain-based' curricula has led to the promulgation of a number of 'neuromyths' (critical stages, left and right brain learning) and the publication of a number of pseudo-scientific programmes (for example, Brain Gym), which arise from overgeneralisations or misinterpretations of the actual scientific findings so far established.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Unlimited access to news and opinion
-
Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news
Already have an account? Sign in here