Features

Learning & Development: Babies - Home and away

In the third part of this series marking Early Education and Nursery World’s tenth decades, Dr Peter Elfer explains why the job of raising the status of, and investment in, caring for the under-twos is not over

Many of the issues currently being debated in nursery education were being debated 90 years ago. However, this is not the case for babies, who then had barely any presence on the public early education and childcare agenda.

Babies were certainly being cared for outside the family a hundred years ago through private arrangements. Some of that care was no doubt very good, but ‘baby farming’, collective care in appallingly neglectful and abusive circumstances, was notorious.

Pioneering educators recognised the importance of nursery education for two-year-olds upwards by the turn of the 20th century and before, but official attitude was that this was a private matter for families. At the end of the Second World War, a joint Ministries of Health and Education circular could not have been more explicit that the ‘right place for under-twos was at home with their mothers’.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here