![](/media/h0zbwd1j/b6308a849e207440fc8524c0adbc4101.gif?width=1002&height=668&bgcolor=White&v=1da4d89d91dfb50)
While there is clarity around requirements for continuing professional development under the revised EYFS, the early years sector continues to protest that Level 2 and 3 qualifications are simply not up to scratch.
In her final report on qualifications, published in June, Professor Cathy Nutbrown was emphatic in her rejection of the move to a single qualification as a licence to practice. The report delivered a raft of recommendations designed to return to the standards of the old NNEB.
On the whole, the sector has responded positively - particularly to Professor Nutbrown's recommendations that Level 3 should be strengthened with more child development content, and that college tuition and work placements should be of a higher quality. Some people feel slightly less comfortable with her proposal that GCSE English and maths A-C grades should be required for entry to a Level 3 course and should become the sector standard.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Unlimited access to news and opinion
-
Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news
Already have an account? Sign in here