News

Short measures

Early years practitioners who rejoiced over the Birth to Three Matters framework now fear it may be remade into a curriculum, says Simon Vevers When the Birth to Three Matters framework was produced it was hailed as welcome and overdue guidance for practitioners working with under-threes.

When the Birth to Three Matters framework was produced it was hailed as welcome and overdue guidance for practitioners working with under-threes.

For Peter Elfer, senior lecturer in early childhood studies at Roehampton University, it was a counterweight to an often prevailing culture among policy makers in the UK that 'children are born at three, when the Foundation Stage begins'. Birth to Three Matters, he says, emphasised for the first time 'that children are born at nought' and that the greatest need for that age group 'is support and development, not to be continually measured'.

However, there is uncertainty among practitioners about whether the framework will be incorporated in the revised national care standards.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here