John Dewey said we should 'cease conceiving of education as mere
preparation for later life, and make it the full meaning of the present
life'.
![](/media/w0zn4lok/sue-cowleynew.jpg?width=1002&height=668&bgcolor=White&v=1da4d837e6abd70)
Dewey felt that each part of a child's education had a value in and of itself; that we should let children enjoy the process, rather than constantly striving towards a future goal. Increasingly, though, those who make policy see each phase of education as a preparation for the next, rather than an entity in its own right. Nicky Morgan recently said, 'In future, we could try to link qualifications to tax data too, in order to demonstrate the true worth of certain subjects.' Is the ultimate aim of education, then, about how much tax people end up paying?
This sense of reaching forward is powerfully felt in the early years sector, because these first few years lay the foundation for all that is to come. When he launched Ofsted's report on early years education, Sir Michael Wilshaw talked about 'school readiness' as a key aim for early years settings, and that small children need more structure, preferably within school-based settings. He wanted to be sure that children could sit still and understand that 'no' sets boundaries for behaviour. Apparently Sir Michael has forgotten that his Ofsted data tells us that more than 80 per cent of PVI settings are judged 'good' or 'outstanding'. Or that it is completely normal for small children to wriggle around and push limits from time to time.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Unlimited access to news and opinion
-
Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news
Already have an account? Sign in here